Parablechnum novae-zelandiae
Common names
kiokio, horokio, palm leaf fern
Biostatus
Native – Endemic taxon
Category
Vascular
Structural class
Ferns
Flower colours
No flowers
Detailed description
Rhizome short-creeping, very robust in larger specimens, occasionally suberect or erect; scales to 16 × 3 mm, linear or lanceolate, acuminate, light reddish brown, sometimes dark at base, more or less entire. Fronds dimorphic, erect or pendulous, 0.09–0.3 m (in dry exposed places and in swamps) –3.5 m long (on stream banks) × 35–500 mm wide, widest mid frond; sterile and fertile fronds usually similar length. Stipes 0.08–0.75 m (stipes of fertile fronds often shorter than stipes of sterile fronds), stout, to c. 10 mm diameter, pale brown or pinkish brown, darkening at base, scaly, especially at the base; scales 2–20 × 1–3 mm wide, but mostly small and appressed, ovate, reddish brown, concolorous or “black-spot”, entire or branched at their bases. Lamina ovate or lanceolate, bright mid green at maturity, 1-pinnate, 5–50 pairs of pinnae. Rachis and costae pale pinkish brown, with sparse to moderately dense scales and irregular fine short tangled hairs; scales 3.0–15.0 × 1.0–1.5 mm, variable in shape from linear to ovate or sometimes stellate, pale brown, reddish brown, “black spot” (especially conspicuous for costal scales), or sometimes entirely concolorous (juveniles and plants growing in swamps, and most plants on the Kermadec islands), entire or toothed. Sterile pinnae 20–350 × 6–30 mm, oblong-lanceolate to lanceolate, apices acute, acuminate, or attenuate, or, in juveniles and smaller plants growing in swamps, obtuse; cuneate, truncate, or rounded-cordate at rachis; sub-petiolate at base of lamina, adnate and decurrent at apex; mostly coriaceous but almost membranous in juveniles and plants growing in swamps; margins minutely toothed, more so near apices; veins simple or once-furcate; small-branched or stellate scales often extending on to lower surface of pinnae; basal pinnae rounder and nearly always significantly shorter than middle pinnae, with 2–11 pairs of sterile auricles (small plants from swamps, very harsh conditions, and from low light conditions may lack auricles); terminal pinna longer than subterminal pinnae. Fertile pinnae 20.0–250 × 1.5–6.0 mm, narrow, linear, sessile at base of lamina, becoming basiscopically adnate at apex; basal pinnae often with sterile auriculate segments at their bases, the lowermost sometimes completely sterile and auriculate; sori covering under surface except for auriculate zone and the short sterile apical region; indusium brown, laciniate. Spores 40–60 × 32–43 µm.
Similar taxa
Parablechnum novae-zelandiae is recognised by the basal pinnae which are always significantly shorter than the middle pinnae; by the presence of well developed auricles at the base of sterile and fertile fronds; by the rachis and/or abaxial costae usually bearing numerous peltate scales furnished with a clearly defined “black-spot”; and by the straight, acute, acuminate or attenuate, coriaceous and closely spaced pinnae (spacings usually < 10 mm between adjacent pinnae).
Distribution
Endemic. New Zealand: Kermadec Islands (Raoul Island), North Island, South Island, Stewart Island/Rakiura, Chatham Islands.
Habitat
Coastal to montane. One of the most widespread, abundant and easily recognisable ferns in New Zealand. Widely known by the Maori name “kiokio” Blechnum novae-zelandiae is most conspicuous in areas of high rainfall along roadsides, cliff faces, ravines and river banks. It also commonly establishes in pine (Pinus spp.,) plantations and is a common urban “weedy” fern in some parts of the country.
Current conservation status
The conservation status of all known New Zealand vascular plant taxa at the rank of species and below were reassessed in 2022-2023 using the New Zealand Threat Classification System (NZTCS) – more information about this can be found on the NZTCS website. This report includes replaces all previous NZTCS lists for vascular plants. Previous assessments can be found here.
Please note, threat classifications are often suggested by authors when publications fall between NZTCS assessment periods – these interim threat classification statuses has not been assessed by the NZTCS panel.
- Conservation status of vascular plants in Aotearoa New Zealand, 2023. 2024. Peter J. de Lange, Jane Gosden, Shannel P. Courtney, Alexander J. Fergus, John W. Barkla, Sarah M. Beadel, Paul D. Champion, Rowan Hindmarsh-Walls, Troy Makan and Pascale Michel Department of Conservation. Source: NZTCS and licensed by DOC for reuse under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence.
2023 | Not Threatened
Detailed taxonomy
Family
Blechnaceae
Synonyms
Stegania procera var. stipulosa A.Rich.; Blechnum capense sensu Cheeseman; Lomaria capensis sensu Cheeseman; Lomaria procera var. flagelliformis Szyszyl.; Blechnum novae-zelandiae T.C.Chambers et P.A.Farrant
Taxonomic notes
Plants referred to this species on Raoul Island (Kermadec Islands) may require further study, these plants are uniformly green (without the strong pink colouration typical of this species in New Zealand proper), and the stipe and rachis scales often lack a black spot. However, taken as a whole these plants still fit within the current circumscription of Parablechnum novae-zelandiae.
Perrie et al. (2014) advocated for a broadened circumscription of Blechnaceae whereby a number of genera traditionally recognised as distinct from Blechnum were merged within it. However, this view has not met with universal acceptance (see Gasper et al. 2016) and does not seem to be followed worldwide (PPG 2016). From a New Zealand perspective the decision to merge Doodia in Blechnum, and rejection of Diploblechnum has not been universally accepted either e.g., Wilcox & Warden (2017), and as such it is considered appropriate to follow world opinion and accept the taxonomy of Gasper et al. (2016) and recommendations of the PPG (2016). See also the comments by Pyner (2017).
Endemic taxon
Yes
Endemic genus
No
Endemic family
No
Ecology
Flowering
Not applicable—spore producing
Fruiting
Not applicable—spore producing
Propagation technique
Easily grown from fresh spores and whole plants, transplants well and flourishes in most conditions. Needs room to spread, often self establishes and can sometimes become aggressive in a small garden.
Wetland plant indicator status rating
Information derived from the revised national wetland plant list prepared to assist councils in delineating and monitoring wetlands (Clarkson et al., 2021 Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research Contract Report LC3975 for Hawke’s Bay Regional Council). The national plant list categorises plants by the extent to which they are found in wetlands and not ‘drylands’. The indicator status ratings are OBL (obligate wetland), FACW (facultative wetland), FAC (facultative), FACU (facultative upland), and UPL (obligate upland). If you have suggestions for the Wetland Indicator Status Rating, please contact: [Enable JavaScript to view protected content]
FAC: Facultative
Commonly occurs as either a hydrophyte or non-hydrophyte (non-wetlands).
Other information
Etymology
novae-zelandiae: Of New Zealand
NVS code
The National Vegetation Survey (NVS) Databank is a physical archive and electronic databank containing records of over 94,000 vegetation survey plots - including data from over 19,000 permanent plots. NVS maintains a standard set of species code abbreviations that correspond to standard scientific plant names from the Ngä Tipu o Aotearoa - New Zealand Plants database.
BLENOV
Chromosome number
2n = 56
Previous conservation statuses
2017 | Not Threatened
2012 | Not Threatened
2009 | Not Threatened
2004 | Not Threatened
Referencing and citations
References and further reading
Chambers TC, Farrant PA. 1998. The Blechnum procerum (“capense”) (Blechnaceae) complex in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Botany 36(1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.1998.9512544.
Gasper AL, de Oliveira Dittrich VA, Smith AR, Salino A. 2016. A classification for Blechnaceae (Polypodiales: Polypodiopsida): New genera, resurrected names, and combinations. Phytotaxa 275: 191–227. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.275.3.1.
Perrie LR, Wilson RK, Shepherd LD, Ohlsen DJ, Batty EL, Brownsey PJ, Bayly MJ. 2014. Molecular phylogenetics and generic taxonomy of Blechnaceae ferns. Taxon 63(4): 745–758. https://doi.org/10.12705/634.13.
PPG 1: The Pteridophyte Phylogeny Group 2016. A community-derived classification for extant lycophytes and ferns. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 54: 563–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12229.
Pyner T. 2017. A new classification of Blechnum. British Pteridological Society. https://ebps.org.uk/new-classification-blechnum/. Accessed [INSERT DATE ACCESSED].
Wilcox M, Warden J. 2017. Botany of Hillsborough coast bush reserves, Manukau Harbour, Auckland. Auckland Botanical Society Journal 72: 32–46.
Attribution
Fact sheet prepared for NZPCN by P.J. de Lange (7 March 2012). Description adapted Chambers & Farrant (1998).
NZPCN Fact Sheet citation
Please cite as: de Lange, P.J. (Year at time of access): Parablechnum novae-zelandiae Fact Sheet (content continuously updated). New Zealand Plant Conservation Network. https://www.nzpcn.org.nz/flora/species/parablechnum-novae-zelandiae/ (Date website was queried)