Myosotis oreophila
Synonyms
None (first described in 1896).
Family
Boraginaceae
Flora category
Vascular – Native
Endemic taxon
Yes
Endemic genus
No
Endemic family
No
Structural class
Herbs - Dicotyledons other than Composites
Current conservation status
The threat classification status of all known New Zealand vascular plant taxa at the rank of species and below were reassessed in 2017 using the New Zealand Threat Classification System (NZTCS) – more information about this can be found on the NZTCS website This report includes a statistical summary and brief notes on changes since 2012 and replaces all previous NZTCS lists for vascular plants. Authors: By Peter J. de Lange, Jeremy R. Rolfe, John W. Barkla, Shannel P. Courtney, Paul D. Champion, Leon R. Perrie, Sarah M. Beadel, Kerry A. Ford, Ilse Breitwieser, Ines Schönberger, Rowan Hindmarsh-Walls, Peter B. Heenan and Kate Ladley. Please note, threat classifications are often suggested by authors when publications fall between NZTCS assessment periods – a suggested threat classification status has not been assessed by the NZTCS panel.
Source: NZTCS and licensed by DOC for reuse under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence.
2017 | Threatened – Nationally Critical | Qualifiers: EF, St, Sp
Previous conservation statuses
2012 | Threatened – Nationally Critical | Qualifiers: EF, Sp, St
2009 | At Risk – Naturally Uncommon | Qualifiers: EF
2004 | Range Restricted
Distribution
Endemic. South Island: Central Otago.
Habitat
According to research by Rebecca Stanley Myosotis oreophila is now known from only one site where it is confined to c.1.5 ha of fellfield (stony pavement of large and splintered blocks of schist) at 1590m altitude. Here it grows with Dracophyllum muscoides, Raoulia hectori and a diverse array of lichens.
Features
Loosely tufted perennial herb. Rosette-leaves up to 40 × 10 mm, linear-spathulate, lamina tapering gradually into broad petiole of about the same length, tip obtuse, apiculate; hairs long, rather stiff, closely appressed, on upper surface almost touching mostly straight, some retrorse, on undersurface sparse, mostly all retrorse. Lateral branches few, ascending to erect, 70 mm or more long, leafy to cyme, internodes less than leaves. Stem-leaves c. 15 × 2 mm, linear-oblong, tip subacute; hairs on upper surface mostly long, stiff, appressed, on undersurface sparser and about half of them retrorse. Cymes simple, ebracteate, compact and c.20 mm long in fruit; internodes and pedicels very short. Calyx 6-9 mm long, lobes cut to less than half calyx length, narrow-oblong and subacute, hairs on lobes long and slightly flexuous, long ones towards base slightly hooked with underlayer of shorter appressed retrorse hairs. Corolla one-half longer than the calyx, funnelform, white, the lobes 5, spreading, and obtusely rounded. Stamens 5, very slightly exserted; filaments about equal in length to anthers; anthers large, shortly exserted, springing from the base of the corolla lobes; scales obscure. Style twice as long as calyx, slender. Nutlet 1.8-2.4 × 1.0-1.2 mm, ovate to ovate-elliptic or oblong-elliptic, black.
Similar taxa
Recognised by the stamen filaments which are about the same length as the anthers, rosette-leaves which are distnctly broader than the stem leaves, by the stiff, smoothly appressed hairs - and especially by the presence of retrorse hairs on the rosette-leaves (especially the abaxial surface). In the original description of the species the naming author Petrie noted that the flowers of M. oreophila were purple (see Allan 1961). However, all subsequent gatherings of this species have white flowers - and it seems likely that flower colour is an artifact of drying, it having been observed that some white-flowered myosoti (such as for example M. colensoi) on drying, over time change their flower colour to pale blue. This phenomena is also present in Wahlenbergia, and was it seems the basis for the white-flowered Geum divergens being described as having yellow flowers (New Zealand Geum flowers fade to yellow in herbarium conditions - often within months of drying). Whether this observation accounts for Petrie’s account of a purple-flowered Myosotis oreophila remains to be tested. Irrespective to date no purple-flowered M. oreophila has yet been seen in the wild.
Flowering
December - January
Flower colours
White
Fruiting
January - April
Propagation technique
Unknown. Likely to be difficult. Probably best grown in an alpine house or rock garden
Threats
This species is not threatened though the population is very small (covering an area of 1.5 ha) and in terms of density and size it fluctuates widely from year to year indicating that it is (like many myosoti) an opportunistic species responding quickly to favorable temperatures and conditions (R. J. Stanley pers. comm.). Not thought to be palatable to hares which are present within its habitat. Hawkweed (Pilosella officinarum) has been found in the general area but there is no evidence that it competes with Myosotis oreophila. M. oreophila, in common with many alpine myosoti has better seed set if plants are outcrossed, though it can still set good quality seed through selfing. It was originally described from plants gathered on Mt Ida where it has never been seen since.
Etymology
myosotis: Mouse-eared
oreophila: Mountain lover
Where To Buy
Not commercially available
Attribution
Fact Sheet prepared for NZPCN by P.J. de Lange. Description based on Allan (1961).
References and further reading
Allan, H.H. 1961: Flora of New Zealand. Vol. I. Goverment Printer, Wellington.
NZPCN Fact Sheet citation
Please cite as: de Lange, P.J. (Year at time of access): Myosotis oreophila Fact Sheet (content continuously updated). New Zealand Plant Conservation Network. https://www.nzpcn.org.nz/flora/species/myosotis-oreophila/ (Date website was queried)